On October 15, the Supreme Court heard nearly 2.5 hours of oral argument in the Voting Rights Act Case. Without even taking a break, the Court heard the second case, fittingly titled Case v. Montana.
Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. When can the police enter a person’s home without a warrant? The Fourth Amendment and the various judicial exceptions to it don’t ...
The Trump administration’s use of administrative warrants and rough-and-tumble ICE enforcement tactics are creating negative ...
ICE claims power to enter homes without a judge’s warrant. A former federal judge explains why that guts the Fourth Amendment and endangers everyone.
The right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure had an up-and-down sort of year at the U.S. Supreme Court. Back in May, the Court delivered a 9–0 decision that left civil libertarians ...
The Supreme Court’s review of United States v. Chatrie puts geofence warrants and mass digital data seizures under Fourth Amendment scrutiny, raising urgent questions about particularity, AI-driven ...
Most concerning is that they can requisition these data without ever having to get a probable cause-based warrant, as ...
For the U.S. Supreme Court majority, poor quality decisions are the new normal. They draft edicts on major issues — not opinions. Such is the case with their new shadow docket decision on racial ...
The Supreme Court entered an order today staying an order by a Los Angeles district court that had imposed a broad injunction in how the Trump Administration can enforce the immigration laws. The ...
When can the police enter a person’s home without a warrant? The Fourth Amendment and the various judicial exceptions to it don’t provide a clear answer. But the Supreme Court may provide some clarity ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results